Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America.

International journal of obesity (2005). 2008;32(6):992-1000

Other resources

Plain language summary

Overweight individuals are frequent targets of weight stigmatisation and prejudice. Negative implications include impairments in psychological well-being and physical health. The aim of this study was to document rates and patterns of weight/height discrimination in comparison to other forms of discrimination (based on gender and race) among adults in the United States. Respondents were drawn from a nationally representative sample of community-based English-speaking adults aged 25–74 years in the United States. A total of 2290 individuals (1104 men and 1186 women) were eligible for the study. Results demonstrate greater vulnerability to weight bias among youth at higher levels of obesity, and that women are more vulnerable to weight/height discrimination than men. Authors conclude that the prevalence of weight/height discrimination is high in the United States and it is comparable to rates of racial discrimination.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Limited data are available on the prevalence and patterns of body weight discrimination from representative samples. This study examined experiences of weight/height discrimination in a nationally representative sample of US adults and compared their prevalence and patterns with discrimination experiences based on race and gender. METHOD AND PROCEDURES Data were from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, a 1995-1996 community-based survey of English-speaking adults aged 25-74 (N=2290). Reported experiences of weight/height discrimination included a variety of institutional settings and interpersonal relationships. Multivariate regression analyses were used to predict weight/height discrimination controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and body weight status. RESULTS The prevalence of weight/height discrimination ranged from 5% among men to 10% among women, but these average percentages obscure the much higher risk of weight discrimination among heavier individuals (40% for adults with body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above). Younger individuals with a higher BMI had a particularly high risk of weight/height discrimination regardless of their race, education and weight status. Women were at greater risk for weight/height discrimination than men, especially women with a BMI of 30-35 who were three times more likely to report weight/height discrimination compared to male peers of a similar weight. DISCUSSION Weight/height discrimination is prevalent in American society and is relatively close to reported rates of racial discrimination, particularly among women. Both institutional forms of weight/height discrimination (for example, in employment settings) and interpersonal mistreatment due to weight/height (for example, being called names) were common, and in some cases were even more prevalent than discrimination due to gender and race.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Neurological
Patient Centred Factors : Triggers/Weight stigma
Environmental Inputs : Psychosocial influences
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Relationships and network ; Psychological
Functional Laboratory Testing : Not applicable

Methodological quality

Jadad score : Not applicable
Allocation concealment : Not applicable

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Overweight ; Obesity ; Physical activity ; Body mass index ; BMI